Monthly Archives: September 2019


Roman Busev v. William Barr

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 09 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROMAN BUSEV, No. 17-73118 Petitioner, Agency No. A076-035-712 v. MEMORANDUM* * WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.* On Petition for Review of a Final Order of […]


Johnson v. State

Clifton Johnson v. State, No. 1386, September Term 2017 Opinion by Kehoe, J. Criminal Procedure: Fourth Amendment: Traffic Checkpoints and “Traffic Initia- tives”: A “traffic initiative” conducted by the Baltimore City Police Department was not a traffic checkpoint for Fourth Amendment purposes. In conducting the traffic initiative, the police did […]


Ricardo Torres v. Precision Indus., Inc.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RICARDO TORRES, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │ > No. 18-5850 v. │ │ │ PRECISION INDUSTRIES, INC., │ Defendant-Appellee. │ ┘ Appeal from the United States District Court for […]


Irlis Maheli Lopez Barrios v. U.S. Attorney General

Case: 18-12756 Date Filed: 09/06/2019 Page: 1 of 11 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-12756 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ Agency No. A206-730-222 IRLIS MAHELI LOPEZ BARRIOS, ONEYBER JOSUE DE LEON-LOPEZ, Petitioners, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. ________________________ Petition for Review […]


Goncalves Pontes v. Barr

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1053 DANIELSON MENDES GONCALVES PONTES, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Torruella, Selya, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges. Jerome P. Mayer-Cantu, with whom Philip […]


Ramirez-Aguilar v. Barr

17-1080-ag Ramirez-Aguilar v. Barr UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS […]