Daily Archives: November 9, 2021


State Of Washington, V. Nga Ngoeung

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two November 9, 2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 54110-6-II Respondent, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND NGA NGOEUNG, WITHDRAWING OPINION Appellant. Respondent, State of Washington, moves this court to reconsider […]


Balalovski v. Tanevski

[Cite as Balalovski v. Tanevski, 2021-Ohio-3990.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Aleksandar S. Balalovski, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-447 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CV-11123) Dance Tanevski, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant, : Lence Tanevski, : Defendant-Appellee. : D E C I S I O N Rendered […]


Reina A. v. Alber S. CA2/2

Filed 11/9/21 Reina A. v. Alber S. CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b ). This opinion has not […]


State v. Benito Ya

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. BENITO YA NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V. MARTIN […]


Sevilla-Hernandez v. Garland

18-2291 Sevilla-Hernandez v. Garland BIA Straus, IJ A200 941 560 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE […]


Hamida v. Garland

20-290 Hamida v. Garland BIA A076 134 193 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE […]