Daily Archives: March 22, 2022


Carlos Baires v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARLOS ANTONIO BAIRES, No. 16-73039 Petitioner, Agency No. A092-370-994 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the […]


Marvin Moran v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARVIN GIOVANNY MORAN, No. 16-73206 Petitioner, Agency No. A094-321-869 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the […]


Xin He v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT XIN BIAO HE, No. 21-70488 Petitioner, Agency No. A215-825-306 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the […]


Yunga-Mera v. Garland

20-1657 Yunga-Mera v. Garland BIA Vomacka, IJ A206 451 010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE […]


Ramirez v. Blinken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DANIEL RAMIREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 21-cv-1099 (CRC) ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiffs in this case are U.S. citizens and their non-citizen fiancés with K-1 visa applications pending or soon to be pending at the […]


People v. Gonzalez CA3

Filed 3/22/22 P. v. Gonzalez CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published […]


Natarajan v. Natarajan

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE In re the Marriage of: RAKESH NATARAJAN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. MEGALA NATARAJAN, Respondent/Appellee. Nos. 1 CA-CV […]