Daily Archives: June 28, 2023


Turenne v. State

Roseberline Turenne v. State of Maryland, No. 714, September Term 2022. Opinion by Wells, C. J. CRIMINAL LAW — CHILD PORNOGRAPHY — SEXUAL CONDUCT— “LASCIVIOUS EXHIBITION OF THE GENITALS” — STANDARD In 2019, the General Assembly added “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person” to its […]


Corrales Corrales v. Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED JUN 28 2023 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE CORRALES CORRALES, No. 21-625 Agency No. Petitioner, A094-301-121 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the […]


Zochlinski v. Blum CA3

Filed 6/28/23 Zochlinski v. Blum CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published […]


Yu v. Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LINQIANG YU, No. 22-1235 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-191-173 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board […]


Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JOSE GUADALUPE GONZALEZ- No. 21-1188 RODRIGUEZ, Agency No. A 200-569-613 Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order […]


Montufar Orantes v. Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED JUN 28 2023 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE B. MONTUFAR ORANTES, No. 21-1383 Petitioner, Agency No. A071-584-496 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of […]