NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDRES DE JESUS MEJIA-CASTILLO; et No. 20-73716 al., Agency Nos. A209-835-409 Petitioners, A209-835-408 A209-838-699 v. A209-838-700 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM* Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 14, 2023** Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Andres De Jesus Mejia-Castillo and three family members, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider where they failed to identify any error of law or fact in the prior decision. See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A petitioner’s motion to reconsider must identify a legal or factual error in the BIA’s prior decision.”); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (same). We lack jurisdiction to consider any challenge to the BIA’s August 31, 2020, order dismissing petitioners’ appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for asylum and related relief because petitioners did not file a petition for review as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Martinez- Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir. 1996) (time limit for filing a petition for review is “mandatory and jurisdictional”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 20-73716 20-73716 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Andres Mejia-Castillo v. Merrick Garland 20 March 2023 Unpublished 5340ac826a83b18f4071b804ff96afe8c90d42ed
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals