UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1052 JEAN MURAT MONTREVIL, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 9, 2018 Decided: August 16, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Kiley Kane, Senior Litigation Counsel, Julie M. Iversen, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jean Murat Montrevil, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ amended order denying his motion to reopen. Montrevil’s motion was untimely filed and number-barred, and the Board declined to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen his proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to review how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). Additionally, as we have previously determined, see Montrevil v. Gonzales, 343 F. App’x 861 (4th Cir. 2009), we lack jurisdiction to consider Montrevil’s petition for review absent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D) (2012). Because we are barred from reviewing Montrevil’s challenges to the Board’s denial of his motion for sua sponte reopening and Montrevil fails to raise any independent colorable constitutional claims or questions of law under § 1252(a)(2)(D), we find ourselves without jurisdiction and therefore dismiss the petition for review. We deny Montrevil’s motion to file a supplemental appendix and deny the pending motion for stay as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED 2 18-1052 Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ca4 4th Cir. Jean Montrevil v. Jefferson Sessions III 16 August 2018 Unpublished 9dbe467d2461c17352c86fd389ce28afbf84f3ef
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals