17-2181 Beltran-De Roque v. Barr BIA Christensen, IJ A202 075 721/722/723 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall 3 United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 4 New York, on the 8th day of August, two thousand nineteen. 5 6 PRESENT: 7 ROBERT A. KATZMANN, 8 Chief Judge, 9 RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., 10 CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, 11 Circuit Judges. 12 _____________________________________ 13 14 MAYRA BELTRAN-DE ROQUE, 15 RAQUEL SUHEY ROQUE-BELTRAN, 16 JOSE ARIEL ROQUE-BELTRAN, 17 18 Petitioners, 19 v. 17-2181 20 NAC 21 WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES 22 ATTORNEY GENERAL, 23 24 Respondent. 25 _____________________________________ 26 27 FOR PETITIONERS: Mayra Beltran-De Roque, Pro Se, 28 Brooklyn, NY. 29 FOR RESPONDENT: Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant 30 Attorney General; Emily Anne 31 Radford, Assistant Director; David 1 Kim, Trial Attorney, Office of 2 Immigration Litigation, Civil 3 Division, United States Department 4 of Justice, Washington, DC. 5 6 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a 7 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby 8 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review 9 is DENIED. 10 Petitioners Mayra Beltran-De Roque, and her minor 11 children, Raquel Suhey Roque-Beltran and Jose Ariel Roque- 12 Beltran, natives and citizens of El Salvador, seek review of 13 a June 15, 2017 decision of the BIA affirming a November 14, 14 2016 decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Beltran- 15 De Roque’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, 16 and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In 17 re Mayra Beltran-De Roque, Raquel Suhey Roque-Beltran, Jose 18 Ariel Roque-Beltran, Nos. A 202 075 721/722/723 (B.I.A. June 19 15, 2017), aff’g Nos. A 202 075 721/722/723 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. 20 City Nov. 14, 2016). We assume the parties’ familiarity with 21 the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. 22 Under the circumstances of this case, we have considered 23 both the IJ’s and the BIA’s decisions “for the sake of 24 completeness.” Wangchuck v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 448 F.3d 25 524, 528 (2d Cir. 2006). The applicable standards of review 2 1 are well established. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); Yanqin 2 Weng v. Holder, 562 F.3d 510, 513 (2d Cir. 2009); Gjolaj v. 3 Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 468 F.3d 140, 143 4 ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals