NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 19 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KENIA LISSETH ABARCA-DE POSADA; No. 18-71106 et al., Agency Nos. A208-271-842 Petitioners, A208-271-843 A208-271-844 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM* Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 13, 2020** San Francisco, California Before: HAWKINS and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and GRITZNER,*** District Judge. Kenia Lisseth Abarca de Posada and her two children—Keyli Nicole Chicas Abarca and Emily Sarai Posada Abarca—petition for review of the Board of * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals’ denial of their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s order denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition. Petitioners—citizens of El Salvador—claimed asylum based on alleged persecution by gangs in El Salvador on account of their membership in several particular social groups: individuals performing managerial or secretarial roles at local businesses in El Salvador, family members of Roberto Posada (Abarca de Posada’s husband and Emily and Keyli’s father), family members of Keyli Chicas Abarca, and, specifically for Keyli, Salvadoran teenage girls attending school. Petitioners argue that the BIA erred in affirming the IJ’s finding that there was no nexus between their membership in any proposed particular social group and the threats they faced from gangs in El Salvador. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision. See Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d 887, 891-92 (9th Cir. 2020), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 22, 2020) (No. 20-53). “To establish asylum eligibility, an applicant must show that he is unable or unwilling to return to his country of nationality ‘because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.’” Madrigal v. Holder, 716 F.3d 499, 503 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 2 1101(a)(42)(A)). Abarca de Posada testified before the IJ that gang members attempted to extort all company employees that might have access to money, such as bus drivers and dispatchers, not specifically those in managerial or secretarial roles. She also testified that the gangs were motivated by a desire for money, not because of where she worked, and that all companies paid the gangs. The news reports Petitioners submitted as documentation regarding the murders of two of Abarca de Posada’s coworkers indicate that they were murdered for traveling into the territory of a rival gang, not because of their jobs. Further, Keyli stated in her declaration that the classmate/gang member who harassed her told her she was beautiful ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals