Daniel Gonzalez v. Robert Wilkinson


UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1932 DANIEL TRINIDAD GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 28, 2021 Decided: February 11, 2021 Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Trinidad Gonzalez, Petitioner Pro Se. Micah S. Engler, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel Trinidad Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision finding him removable as charged. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), or that the Board erred in finding that Gonzalez failed to show that he was prejudiced because the IJ did not offer him the opportunity to apply for cancellation of removal or other forms of relief from removal. See In re Gonzalez, (B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2020). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2 20-1932 Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ca4 4th Cir. Daniel Gonzalez v. Robert Wilkinson 11 February 2021 Unpublished d1e6b84403cbd3a68c255c99fdd356001d7feb0f

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals