NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 5 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SINHARIB A. THOMAS, No. 19-72235 Petitioner, Agency No. A090-904-828 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order From the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted October 6, 2020 Submission Deferred October 7, 2020 Resubmitted April 1, 2021 Seattle, Washington Before: GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FREUDENTHAL, ** District Judge * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Nancy D. Freudenthal, United States District Judge for the District of Wyoming, sitting by designation. 1 Sinharib A. Thomas, a native of Iraq and an Assyrian Christian, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we review the denial for abuse of discretion. Agonafer v. Sessions, 859 F.3d 1198, 1202–03 (9th Cir. 2017). We grant the petition. The BIA abused its discretion in concluding that country conditions had not changed materially with respect to Thomas’ eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). The BIA was required to consider whether country conditions changed materially such that Thomas “would more likely than not experience torture ‘inflicted by, or at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of, a public official . . . or other person acting in an official capacity.’” Santos-Ponce v. Wilkinson, 987 F.3d 886, 891 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1)). Affidavits and other evidentiary material in the record describe new threats of severe violence and human rights abuses by self-ascribed anti-American and anti-Christian militias that are now official parts of the Iraqi security apparatus and have effective control of many areas throughout central and southern Iraq. Although the 2008 State Department Report documents general instability, violence, kidnapping, torture, and death, the material change supporting Thomas’ CAT claim is the undisputed evidence of violence and human rights 2 abuses against minorities by militias acting either as the government itself, or with widespread impunity in Iraq. Further, Thomas’ evidence has the requisite “individualized relevancy.” Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 989–90 (9th Cir. 2010); Agonafer, 859 F.3d at 1206. Thomas specifically identified how his predicament is appreciably different from the dangers faced by his fellow citizens: he has no Iraqi identification, does not speak Arabic, has “a clearly Christian last name,” has no knowledge of Iraqi culture, and has “Christian and Assyrian themed tattoos that will make it easy for [certain] groups to target [him].” Those circumstances, combined with restrictions on movement within Iraq, elevate his potential for visibility and change his likelihood to be targeted for torture by or with the acquiescence of the Iraqi state. The record details the various checks at multiple security checkpoints in Iraq, making it extremely difficult for someone like Thomas …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals