Alejandro Muniz-Orosco v. Jefferson Sessions

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 20 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEJANDRO MUNIZ-OROSCO, No. 15-70937 Petitioner, Agency No. A077-084-718 v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 15, 2017** Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Alejandro Muniz-Orosco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and denying a motion to continue. We dismiss the petition for review. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We lack jurisdiction to consider Muniz-Orosco’s unexhausted contention that his conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 273.5 is not a domestic violence conviction. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceeding before the [agency].”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 15-70937 15-70937 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Alejandro Muniz-Orosco v. Jefferson Sessions 20 November 2017 Agency Unpublished 0b079c473d832dce2f7d9c68e14e4cf4662e3b04

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals