Case: 22-60439 Document: 00516756630 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED May 19, 2023 No. 22-60439 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ Alba Aracely Amaya-Hernandez; Jefferson Josael Luna- Amaya, Petitioners, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. ______________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency Nos. A208 752 921, A208 752 922 ______________________________ Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Alba Aracely Amaya-Hernandez and her minor son, both natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from the denial by the immigration judge of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-60439 Document: 00516756630 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 No. 22-60439 relief under the Convention against Torture (CAT).1 We review denials of asylum, withholding, and CAT claims for substantial evidence. Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006). Under this standard, we may not disturb the BIA’s decision unless the evidence “compels” a contrary conclusion. Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 517 (5th Cir. 2012). We consider the IJ’s decision only insofar as it influences the BIA. Id. Amaya-Hernandez points to no record evidence undermining the agency’s conclusion that her assailants’ motive was to obtain information regarding murder of a state prosecutor and they thus targeted Amaya- Hernandez only as a means to that end, unrelated to her family membership. The evidence thus does not compel a conclusion contrary to the agency’s determination that her nuclear family membership was not “one central reason” for the incident. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i); see Vazquez-Guerra v. Garland, 7 F.4th 265, 271 (5th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 1228 (2022); Orellana- Monson, 685 F.3d at 518. A nexus between the harm and a protected ground is an essential element of asylum and withholding claims. See Vazquez- Guerra, 7 F.4th at 269. We therefore do not consider Amaya-Hernandez’s contentions that the attack on her constituted persecution, that her assailants were police officers, that her particular social group is cognizable, and that she faces future persecution. See INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976). We likewise do not consider Amaya-Hernandez’s assertion that, as to withholding, the BIA erred by failing to shift the burden to the Government to show “a fundamental change in circumstances in El Salvador or that relocation would be reasonable.” See Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. at 25. Because Amaya-Hernandez failed to establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily _____________________ 1 Because Amaya-Hernandez’s minor son is a rider on and derivative beneficiary of his mother’s application for relief, we refer herein only to Amaya-Hernandez. 2 Case: 22-60439 Document: 00516756630 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 No. 22-60439 also cannot meet the requirements for withholding of removal. See Jaco v. Garland, 24 F.4th 395, 401 (5th Cir. 2021); Orellana-Monson, 685 …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals