Arnaldo Ravelo v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Case: 17-10337 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10337 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-23047-MGC ARNALDO RAVELO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), Randall Akins, Kendall Field Office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (December 13, 2017) Case: 17-10337 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, * Judge. PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Arnaldo Ravelo brought this civil action under 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. After review and with the benefit of oral argument, this Court concludes that Ravelo has not shown any reversible error in the district court’s final judgment and order dated November 30, 2016. Thus, we affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons already outlined in the district court’s order. 1 AFFIRMED. * Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 1 This Court sua sponte has considered its jurisdiction and concludes that, based on the record and the narrow issue of statutory ineligibility for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident, we have subject matter jurisdiction in this case. See Perez v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 774 F.3d 960, 965–66 (11th Cir. 2014); Mejia Rodriguez v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 562 F.3d 1137, 1142–43 (11th Cir. 2009). 2 17-10337 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ca11 11th Cir. Arnaldo Ravelo v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) 13 December 2017 NEW Unpublished 7f35479f546aa91bb1191d858bca3aaa8e8c1a0d

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals