19-1460 Carcamo-Granillo v. Garland BIA Wilson, IJ A097 740 552 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall 3 United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 4 New York, on the 22nd day of December, two thousand twenty- 5 one. 6 7 PRESENT: 8 REENA RAGGI, 9 DENNY CHIN, 10 JOSEPH F. BIANCO, 11 Circuit Judges. 12 _____________________________________ 13 14 YESSENIA CAROLINA CARCAMO- 15 GRANILLO, 16 Petitioner, 17 18 v. 19-1460 19 NAC 20 MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED 21 STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, 22 Respondent. 23 _____________________________________ 24 25 FOR PETITIONER: Bruno Joseph Bembi, Esq., 26 Hempstead, NY. 27 28 29 1 FOR RESPONDENT: Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney 2 General; Shelley R. Goad , 3 Assistant Director; Russell J.E. 4 Verby, Senior Litigation Counsel, 5 Office of Immigration Litigation, 6 United States Department of 7 Justice, Washington, DC. 8 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a 9 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby 10 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review 11 is DENIED. 12 Petitioner Yessenia Carolina Carcamo-Granillo, a native 13 and citizen of El Salvador, seeks review of an April 22, 2019, 14 decision of the BIA affirming a December 20, 2017, decision 15 of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her application for 16 withholding of removal and protection under the Convention 17 Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Yessenia Carolina Carcamo- 18 Granillo, No. A 097 740 552 (B.I.A. Apr. 22, 2019), aff’g No. 19 A 097 740 552 (U.S. Immig. Ct. N.Y.C. Dec. 20, 2017). We 20 assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and 21 procedural history. 22 We review the IJ’s decision as supplemented by the BIA. 23 See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir. 2005). 24 The applicable standards of review are well established. See 25 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); Paloka v. Holder, 762 F.3d 191, 195 2 1 (2d Cir. 2014) (reviewing factual findings for substantial 2 evidence and questions of law de novo); Sanusi v. 3 Gonzales, 445 F.3d 193, 199 (2d Cir. 2006) (reviewing denial 4 of continuance for abuse of discretion). 5 Carcamo-Granillo applied for withholding of removal and 6 CAT relief, 1 alleging past threats and thefts by members of 7 MS-13 and alleging that she feared future persecution and …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals