NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DARIO CALDERON ABARCA, No. 19-70819 Petitioner, Agency No. A089-862-049 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted September 14, 2021** Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. Dario Calderon Abarca, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and terminate removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Perez v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008), and the denial of a motion to terminate, Dominguez v. Barr, 975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Calderon Abarca’s motion to reopen and terminate where his contention that the immigration court lacked jurisdiction over his proceedings is foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2020) (“the lack of time, date, and place in the NTA sent to [petitioner] did not deprive the immigration court of jurisdiction over her case”). The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-70819 19-70819 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Dario Calderon Abarca v. Merrick Garland 21 September 2021 Agency Unpublished c394914d1fe326b19517af9b1bdda781b7f91eea
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals