NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 10 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DINA MARIBEL LUNA-RAMIREZ, No. 19-70780 Petitioner, Agency No. A098-112-383 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 8, 2020** Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Dina Maribel Luna-Ramirez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Luna-Ramirez’s untimely motion to reopen where she failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2016) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-70780 19-70780 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Dina Luna-Ramirez v. William Barr 10 January 2020 Agency Unpublished 68c1753ba1b35f01058f70482338a6cbbc36786b
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals