NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DORA DEL CARMEN AGUILAR-SANTA No. 19-72698 MARIA; et al., Agency Nos. A209-286-315 Petitioners, A209-286-317 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 19, 2021** Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, AND MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Dora Del Carmen Aguilar-Santa Maria and her son, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We review de novo questions of law. Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We grant the petition for review, and we remand. In its analysis of whether past harm rises to the level of persecution, it appears the agency failed to cumulatively consider the harm to Aguilar-Santa Maria, her father, and her cousin, which Aguilar-Santa Maria testified to having occurred on the shared basis of their family membership. This was error. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009) (“harm to a petitioner’s close relatives, friends, or associates may contribute to a successful showing of past persecution” if the harm was “‘part of a pattern of persecution closely tied to’ [the petitioner] himself” (citation omitted)); see also Parada v. Sessions, 902 F.3d 901, 909-10 (9th Cir. 2018) (concluding the rise to the level determination was not supported where, in part, the agency mischaracterized the harm suffered by petitioner’s family members); Salazar-Paucar v. INS, 281 F.3d 1069, 1075 (9th Cir.2002) (“[E]vidence of harm to Petitioner’s family supports a finding of past persecution.”). We therefore grant the petition for review as to petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims, and remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16- 18 (2002) (per curiam). 2 19-72698 Petitioners’ removal is stayed pending a decision by the BIA. The government shall bear the costs for this petition for review. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. 3 19-72698 19-72698 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Dora Aguilar-Santa Maria v. Merrick Garland 23 July 2021 Agency Unpublished d73f1eecbc30d0941ffe19db647a2f78fa35be4f
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals