Duglas Ramos-Enriquez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty


Case: 18-60580 Document: 00515129717 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 24, 2019 No. 18-60580 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk DUGLAS ULISES RAMOS-ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner v. WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A206 806 646 Before DAVIS, SMITH and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Duglas Ulises Ramos-Enriquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, seeks review of the dismissal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of his appeal from the denial by the Immigration Judge (IJ) of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-60580 Document: 00515129717 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2019 No. 18-60580 We review the decision of the BIA and consider the IJ’s decision only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Shaikh v. Holder, 588 F.3d 861, 863 (5th Cir. 2009). We review questions of law de novo and factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. Under the substantial evidence standard, “[t]he alien must show that the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it.” Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 537 (5th Cir. 2009); see also Zhang v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Here, the substantial evidence in the record supports the BIA’s rejection of Ramos- Enriquez’s claims for asylum, see Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 518-19 (5th Cir. 2012); Mwembie v. Gonzales, 443 F.3d 405, 415 (5th Cir. 2006), for withholding of removal, see Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002), and for protection under the CAT, see Ramirez-Mejia v. Lynch, 794 F.3d 485 (5th Cir. 2015); Zhang, 432 F.3d at 344-45. PETITION DENIED. 2 18-60580 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ca5 5th Cir. Duglas Ramos-Enriquez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty 24 September 2019 Immigration Unpublished 2af773858303af2d39ab0e7af08c4234a1cfde5e

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals