USCA11 Case: 22-10445 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 05/18/2023 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10445 ____________________ ESMELDA RUIZ, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. ____________________ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A096-091-552 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10445 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 05/18/2023 Page: 2 of 31 2 Opinion of the Court 22-10445 Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: Esmelda Ruiz, a native and citizen of Peru, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that she is ineligible for relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2), a provision whose language was originally adopted as part of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 and that outlines the conditions under which certain “bat- tered spouse[s] or child[ren]” qualify for discretionary cancellation of removal. As relevant here, it requires a petitioning alien to show that she “has been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty” by her spouse or parent. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A)(i). Ruiz contends that the Immigration Judge and the BIA made two errors in refusing her cancellation request. First, she maintains that, as a matter of law, they misinterpreted the statutory term “ex- treme cruelty” to require proof of physical—as distinguished from mental or emotional—abuse. And second, she asserts that, having misread the law, the IJ and the BIA wrongly concluded that she doesn’t qualify for discretionary relief. We agree with Ruiz that the IJ and the BIA misinterpreted § 1229b(b)(2) and thereby applied an erroneous legal standard in evaluating her request for cancellation of removal. Accordingly, we grant her petition for review and remand to the BIA for further consideration. USCA11 Case: 22-10445 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 05/18/2023 Page: 3 of 31 22-10445 Opinion of the Court 3 I A Esmelda Ruiz entered the United States with her son on a six-month nonimmigrant visa in 2001. Shortly thereafter, she mar- ried Gavin Blanco. Only a year into her marriage, Ruiz was diag- nosed with breast cancer. She received chemotherapy and, as a re- sult, lost her hair and broke out in hives. Ruiz testified that follow- ing her diagnosis Blanco’s attitude toward her changed, and he be- came “rude” and “obnoxious.” He told her that “if they remove[d] [her] breast, that was the end of it.” After she underwent a mastec- tomy, he “got [her] out of [the] bed” in “a cruel way,” grabbed her arm, forced her in front of a mirror, and said, “You are not a woman for me anymore.” Ruiz’s son, Cristian, corroborated that incident and testified that, in general, Blanco “scream[ed] at” her. Cristian also reported that he once heard “something break” while Ruiz and Blanco were arguing. Following Ruiz’s mastectomy, Blanco filed for divorce, sought a restraining order against her, and, she says, took $2,500 from their joint bank account. Save for the one instance in which he grabbed her arm, Ruiz has not alleged that Blanco physically abused her. She …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals