Gretel Garcia-Gonzalez v. William Barr


NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GRETEL NOEMI GARCIA-GONZALEZ, No. 19-70830 AKA Gretel Gonzalez-Villatoro; HUGO VILLATORO-GARCIA, Agency Nos. A200-833-733 A200-705-007 Petitioners, v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2019** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Gretel Noemi Garcia-Gonzalez and Hugo Villatoro-Garcia, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion. Najmabadi * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ untimely motion to reopen where petitioners failed to demonstrate changed country conditions in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitation. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990- 91 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-70830 19-70830 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Gretel Garcia-Gonzalez v. William Barr 26 November 2019 Agency Unpublished 88aafeda2ed7db719d6614892a8368d998a1314f

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals