14-1867 (L) Hassan v. Barr BIA Hom, IJ A088 935 407/408/410/411 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall 3 United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 4 New York, on the 13th day of July, two thousand twenty. 5 6 PRESENT: 7 PIERRE N. LEVAL, 8 JOSÉ A. CABRANES, 9 GERARD E. LYNCH, 10 Circuit Judges. 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 MINHAJ HASSAN, SAIKA HASSAN, 14 SADID HASSAN, SAMARA HASSAN, 15 Petitioners, 1 16 17 v. 14-1867 (L), 18 14-4733 (Con) 19 NAC 20 WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES 21 ATTORNEY GENERAL, 22 Respondent. 23 _____________________________________ 24 1Abrar Hassan has been removed as a petitioner because his removal proceedings were terminated after he adjusted to lawful permanent resident status. In re Abrar Hassan, No. A 088 935 409 (B.I.A. Nov. 26, 2014). 1 FOR PETITIONER: Brian H. Getson, Getson & Schatz, 2 P.C., Philadelphia, PA. 3 4 FOR RESPONDENT: Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney 5 General; Kohsei Ugumori, Senior 6 Litigation Counsel; Jesse Lloyd 7 Busen, Trial Attorney, Office of 8 Immigration Litigation, United 9 States Department of Justice, 10 Washington, DC. 11 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of these petitions for review of 12 two Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decisions, it is 13 hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for 14 review in the lead case, 14-1867, is DISMISSED in part and 15 GRANTED in part, and the petition for review in the 16 consolidated case, 14-4733, is DENIED. 17 Petitioners Minhaj Hassan (“Hassan”) and Saika Hassan, 18 natives and citizens of Bangladesh, and Sadid Hassan and 19 Samara Hassan, seek review of two decisions: (1) a May 6, 20 2014, decision of the BIA affirming a May 25, 2012, decision 21 of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Hassan’s application 22 for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 23 Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and ordering their 24 removal, and (2) a November 26, 2014, decision of the BIA 25 denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. In re Minhaj 26 Hassan, et al., Nos. A 088 935 407/408/409/410/411 (B.I.A. 2 1 May 6, 2014), aff’g Nos. A 088 935 407/408/409/410/411 (Immig. 2 Ct. N.Y. City May 25, 2012); In re Minhaj Hassan, et al., 3 Nos. A 088 935 407/408/410/411 (B.I.A. Nov. 26, 2014). We 4 assume the parties’ familiarity ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals