Irma Lanwglois-Roldan v. Jefferson Sessions III

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2445 IRMA IVONNE LANWGLOIS-ROLDAN, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 28, 2017 Decided: September 21, 2017 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anna M. Gallagher, MAGGIO & KATTAR, P.C., Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Dawn S. Conrad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Remi Da Rocha-Afodu, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Irma Ivonne Lanwglois-Roldan, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including Lanwglois- Roldan’s supporting evidence and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias– Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Lanwglois-Roldan (B.I.A. Dec. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2 16-2445 Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ca4 4th Cir. Irma Lanwglois-Roldan v. Jefferson Sessions III 21 September 2017 Unpublished 0cb828f983463560973bbc4b37d0712c1145137e

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals