Jean Nana v. Jefferson Sessions III

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1337 JEAN CLAUDE NANA, Petitioner, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 21, 2017 Decided: October 12, 2017 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jessica E. Burns, Senior Litigation Counsel, Juria L. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jean Claude Nana, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Nana’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Nana, (B.I.A. Feb. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2 17-1337 Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ca4 4th Cir. Jean Nana v. Jefferson Sessions III 12 October 2017 Unpublished 08de5123398ec28dd909ed8ba20c090bf9820386

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals