NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ——————— No. 20-2236 ——————— JUAN DISLA VASQUEZ, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent ——————— On Petition for Review of Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency No. A055-011-649) Immigration Judge: Leo A. Finston _______________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 29, 2021 Before: MATEY and JORDAN, Circuit Judges, BOLTON*, Senior District Judge. ——————— OPINION** ——————— * The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. ** This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. BOLTON, Senior District Judge Juan Disla Vasquez (“Vasquez”) petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board” or “BIA”) denying his application for cancellation of removal. The Board reversed an immigration judge’s grant of Vasquez’s application based on discretionary grounds. For the reasons given below, we conclude that we have no jurisdiction to review the denial by the BIA so we will dismiss Vasquez’s petition. Vasquez, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, was admitted to the United States as a legal permanent resident on August 17, 2001 as a 17-year old. He has never returned to the Dominican Republic in the nearly 20 years he has been in the United States and lacks strong family ties to that country. In contrast to his lack of ties to the Dominican Republic, Vasquez has many family members who live in the United States, including his U.S. citizen wife and son who live in Florida. Since his arrival, Vasquez has maintained a fairly consistent employment record and generally paid his taxes. Vasquez also has three criminal convictions. The first conviction, stemming from an incident in 2011 where he exposed his genitalia to a female neighbor from the second story of his home, was for endangering the welfare of a child. Although no children were apparently present at the time of the incident, Vasquez noted in his plea colloquy that children often played in the area. Vasquez was convicted in 2013 and received a sentence of three years imprisonment, mandatory registration as a sex offender under Megan’s Law, and lifetime parole supervision. Vasquez also has two convictions stemming from separate incidents in 2017 for Criminal Mischief-Damage to Property and a DUI. 2 In 2017, DHS initiated removal proceedings against Vasquez based on his 2013 criminal conviction and charged him as removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) as an alien who had been convicted of a crime of domestic violence, stalking, or child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment. Vasquez contested removability and applied for cancellation of removal. In 2019, an immigration judge found Vasquez removable, but granted Vasquez’s application, determining that he warranted a positive exercise of discretion. That decision was appealed to the Board, which reevaluated the immigration judge’s discretionary grant and disagreed with the immigration judge’s assessment of the seriousness of Vasquez’s 2013 ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals