Manuel Vera Rizo v. Jefferson Sessions, III


NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 20 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MANUEL VERA RIZO, AKA Manuel Vera No. 16-73767 Jr. Rizo, AKA Manuel Rizo, Jr., AKA Manuel Rizo Vera, Agency No. A077-126-866 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 15, 2018** Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Manuel Vera Rizo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable and denying relief. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional claims and questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. The agency did not err or violate due process in finding the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that Vera Rizo had been convicted of robbery under California Penal Code § 211, where DHS provided a certified electronic docket sheet reflecting Vera Rizo’s no contest plea to that charge. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(B)(iii) (a docket entry from court records that indicates the existence of the conviction constitutes proof of a criminal conviction); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). The record does not support Vera Rizo’s contentions that the electronic docket sheet was mis-numbered, improperly certified, incomplete, or that it was otherwise insufficient to establish the existence of the conviction. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 16-73767 16-73767 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Manuel Vera Rizo v. Jefferson Sessions, III 20 August 2018 Agency Unpublished 07f271d6482c0686ff39faf91381726a07771733

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals