Martha Figueroa-Zavala v. Robert Wilkinson


NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARTHA FIGUEROA-ZAVALA, AKA No. 19-71760 Marta Zavala Luna, AKA Martha Zavala Luna, Agency No. A204-149-438 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 20, 2021** Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Martha Figueroa-Zavala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for relief under the * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review. In her opening brief, Figueroa-Zavala does not challenge the agency’s denial of her asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Figueroa-Zavala failed to show it is more likely than not she will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1033-35 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that petitioner did not establish the necessary “state action” for CAT relief); Dhital v. Mukasey, 532 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir. 2008) (“the petitioner must demonstrate that he would be subject to a particularized threat of torture” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-71760 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Martha Figueroa-Zavala v. Robert Wilkinson 27 January 2021 Agency Unpublished 9f5c1d2d9098c1f18bc54413241ee877deb82530

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals