NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OSBALDO O. FLORES-MONDRAGON, No. 19-71829 Mondragon Flores, Agency No. A072-258-519 Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 2, 2020** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Osbaldo O. Flores-Mondragon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of deferral of removal under CAT because Flores-Mondragon failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too speculative); Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (generalized evidence of violence and crime in Mexico is insufficient to meet standard for CAT relief). We do not consider the materials attached to Flores-Mondragon’s opening brief that were not part of the record before the agency. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (this court’s review is limited to the administrative record underlying the agency’s decision). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-71829 19-71829 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Osbaldo Flores-Mondragon v. William Barr 10 June 2020 Agency Unpublished 4e3574beee4d625d517f9036e377d5eae31841a2
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals