17-1496 Pantelica v. Barr 17-1496 Pantelica v. Barr BIA Hom, IJ A201 162 692/694 A201 290 725/726/727 A201 198/ 445/446/447 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall 3 United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of 4 New York, on the 13th day of August, two thousand nineteen. 5 6 PRESENT: 7 JOHN M. WALKER, JR., 8 PETER W. HALL, 9 RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., 10 Circuit Judges. 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 LENUTA PANTELICA, PATRIZIA 14 PANTELICA, NICU SORIN PANTELICA, 15 CRISTINA PANTELICA, MARIAN 16 PANTELICA, AKA MARIN PANTELICA, 17 CONSTANTIN PANTELICA, AKA 18 CONSTANIN PANTELICA, MIHAELA 19 ELENA DUMITRASCU, AKA MIHAELA 20 ELENA PANTELICA, ARIANNA 21 PANTELICA, 22 Petitioners, 23 24 v. 17-1496 25 NAC 26 WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES 27 ATTORNEY GENERAL, 28 Respondent. 29 _____________________________________ 1 FOR PETITIONERS: David Garth Sullivan, New York, 2 NY. 3 4 FOR RESPONDENT: Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant 5 Attorney General; Anthony C. 6 Payne, Assistant Director; Yedidya 7 Cohen, Trial Attorney, Office of 8 Immigration Litigation, United 9 States Department of Justice, 10 Washington, DC. 11 12 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a 13 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby 14 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review 15 is DENIED. 16 Lenuta Pantelica, Nicu Pantelica, Constantin Pantelica, 17 and their derivative beneficiaries1 (“petitioners”), natives 18 and citizens of Romania, seek review of an April 12, 2017, 19 decision of the BIA affirming an April 19, 2016, decision of 20 an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications for 21 asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 22 Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Lenuta Pantelica 23 et al., Nos. A 201 162 692/ A201 290 725 / A201 198 445 (B.I.A. 24 Apr. 12, 2017), aff’g Nos. A 201 162 692 / A201 290 725 / A201 25 198 445 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Apr. 19, 2016). We assume the 26 parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural 1 The derivative beneficiaries associated with this petition are Patrizia Pantelica (A201 162 694), Cristina Pantelica (A201 290 726), Marian Pantelica (A201 290 727), Mihaela Elena Dumitrascu (A201 198 446), and Arianna Pantelica (A201 198 447). 2 1 history in this case. 2 Asylum: One-Year Filing Deadline 3 An alien is ineligible for asylum ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals