People v. Maya


Filed 3/21/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B290589 (Super. Ct. No. 2010031209) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County) v. MISAEL VENCES MAYA, Defendant and Appellant. A model prisoner is not necessarily a model citizen. Misael Vences Maya appeals an order denying a motion to expunge his misdemeanor conviction for possession of methamphetamine. (Pen. Code, § 1203.4a [rehabilitation of misdemeanants]; Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).)1 We affirm. This appeal concerns the trial court’s denial of Maya’s request to expunge his conviction for possession of methamphetamine following his successful motion to reduce the felony conviction to a misdemeanor. In ruling against Maya, the All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless 1 otherwise stated. trial judge stated that Maya could not establish that he had lived “an honest and upright life” as required by section 1203.4a, subdivision (a) because he has been in continuous state or federal custody following his 2011 conviction. The court later denied Maya’s motion for reconsideration, noting that it was denying relief in the exercise of its discretion. Maya now appeals the denial of his expungement motion and motion for reconsideration. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 30, 2011, Maya pleaded guilty to driving under the influence with six prior driving-under-the-influence convictions, and possession of methamphetamine. (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a), 23550; Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) Maya also admitted that he had served two prior prison terms. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) During the plea colloquy, the prosecutor advised Maya of the immigration consequences of his plea, including possible deportation. On July 7, 2011, the trial court denied probation and sentenced Maya to four years eight months imprisonment, consisting of a three-year upper term for the driving-under-the- influence conviction, an eight-month consecutive term for the drug conviction, and a consecutive one-year term for one prior prison term allegation. The court struck the remaining prior prison term allegation and granted the prosecutor’s motion to dismiss the remaining charges and allegations. The court also imposed various fines and fees and awarded Maya 571 days of presentence custody credit. On December 25, 2012, Maya completed his term of imprisonment. On that date and continuously since that time, the United States Department of Homeland Security received custody of Maya. The Department issued a removal notice 2 stating that Maya was subject to removal as a lawful permanent resident of the United States because he had suffered a conviction for possession of a controlled substance other than 30 grams or less of marijuana for personal use. (8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(B)(i); Padilla v. Kentucky (2010) 559 U.S. 356, 368 [176 L.Ed.2d 284, 295] [Immigration and Nationality Act commands removal for all controlled substance convictions except the “most trivial of marijuana possession cases”].)2 In 2015, Maya filed an application to reduce his methamphetamine drug possession conviction to a misdemeanor, pursuant to section 1170.18, subdivisions (f) and (g) (“Proposition 47”). ...

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals