17-661 Persad v. Barr 17‐661 Persad v. Barr In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2018 (Argued: October 16, 2018 Decided: March 24, 2020) Docket No. 17‐661 ______________ DASRATH D. PERSAD, Petitioner, –v.– WILLIAM P. BARR, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.* ______________ B e f o r e: NEWMAN, CARNEY, and SULLIVAN Circuit Judges.‡ * The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption as above. ‡Judge Richard J. Sullivan, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation when this case was argued and a member of the Court of Appeals when this Opinion issued. ______________ Dasrath D. Persad (“Persad”), a legal permanent resident, petitions for review of an agency order requiring his removal to Trinidad and Tobago. The agency’s decision rested on its determination that Persad’s 1992 military conviction for larceny constituted an “aggravated felony” within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). To establish an aggravated felony under that statutory provision, the government must show by clear and convincing evidence that a noncitizen committed a “theft offense” that resulted in a term of imprisonment of “at least one year.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). In his 1992 court‐martial, Persad pleaded guilty to four violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. See 10 U.S.C. §§ 801‐946. One of the violations was larceny of military property (a theft offense). See 10 U.S.C. § 921. Consistent with the military’s then‐ traditional practice of unitary sentencing (i.e., imposing a single sentence for all charges and specifications of which an accused is convicted), the military judge issued a general sentence that imposed as punishment for all four of Persad’s convictions a term of 30 months’ confinement, undifferentiated among the four violations to which he pleaded. The Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) determined that this sentence satisfied Section 1101(a)(43)(G). On petition for review, Persad argues that the unitary sentencing scheme employed by the military tribunal precludes the government from showing by clear and convincing evidence that the theft count, alone, resulted in a sentence of 12 or more months’ confinement. Resolving this question of first impression in our Circuit, we agree with Persad. We therefore GRANT Persad’s petition and REMAND the cause to the BIA for further proceedings consistent herewith. ______________ ALEXANDER J. SEGAL, Esq., The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, P.L.L.C., New York, N.Y., for Dasrath D. Persad. MATTHEW B. GEORGE, Trial Attorney (Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General & Douglas E. Ginsburg, Assistant Director, on the brief), Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for William P. Barr, United States Attorney General. ______________ 2 CARNEY, Circuit Judge: Dasrath D. Persad (“Persad”), a legal permanent resident, petitions for review of an agency order requiring his removal to Trinidad and Tobago. The agency’s decision rested on its determination that Persad had committed an “aggravated felony” within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G).1 To establish an aggravated ...
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals