Rickey Thompson v. United States


Case: 18-10488 Date Filed: 05/17/2019 Page: 1 of 12 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10488 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 9:16-cv-81071-WPD, 9:07-cr-80036-WPD-1 RICKEY THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (May 17, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, GRANT and HULL, Circuit Judges. HULL, Circuit Judge: Case: 18-10488 Date Filed: 05/17/2019 Page: 2 of 12 Rickey Thompson, a federal prisoner proceeding with counsel, appeals the district court’s denial of his authorized second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. In this appeal, Thompson argues that his two 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) firearm convictions are invalid in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1204 (2018). Specifically, Thompson contends that his predicate second-degree murder offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1111 do not qualify as crimes of violence after Johnson. After careful review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude Thompson’s two federal second-degree murder convictions qualify as crimes of violence under both § 924(c)’s residual and elements clauses. Thus, we affirm the district court’s denial of Thompson’s authorized second § 2255 motion.1 I. BACKGROUND A. Convictions, Direct Appeal, and First § 2255 Motion In 2008, a federal jury convicted Thompson, a Bahamian boat captain, and a codefendant of 30 counts arising out of a drug- and alien-smuggling conspiracy. Relevant to this appeal, during two boat trips in 2006, Thompson pointed a firearm at passengers on the boat whom he had agreed to smuggle into the United States. 1 In reviewing a denial of a motion to vacate under § 2255, we review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Stoufflet v. United States, 757 F.3d 1236, 1239 (11th Cir. 2014). 2 Case: 18-10488 Date Filed: 05/17/2019 Page: 3 of 12 When the passengers said they could not swim, Thompson forced them to jump, or pushed them, from his boat into deep water off the coast of Jupiter Island, Florida, where three of them drowned. Based on this conduct, Thompson was convicted of three counts of second- degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111, and two counts of carrying and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). For the purposes of § 924(c), a “crime of violence” means an offense that is a felony and: (A) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or (B) that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense. 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), (B). We refer to § 924(c)(3)(A) as the “elements clause” and § 924(c)(3)(B) as the “residual ...

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals