United States v. Daniel Reydondo

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-1903 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Daniel Flores Reydondo lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________ Submitted: October 5, 2017 Filed: October 11, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Daniel Flores Reydondo directly appeals after he pled guilty to an immigration offense and the district court1 sentenced him to a prison term at the high end of the 1 The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. calculated guidelines range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions; if sentence is within guidelines range, appellate court may, but is not required to, apply presumption of reasonableness). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. ______________________________ -2- 17-1903 Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ca8 8th Cir. United States v. Daniel Reydondo 11 October 2017 Unpublished 0a5bce08ddb3a2fc1fbacb1cc5be3475bcfa7767

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals