20-886-cr United States v. Hall UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23rd day of April, two thousand twenty-one. PRESENT: DENNY CHIN, MICHAEL H. PARK, Circuit Judges, VICTOR A. BOLDEN, District Judge. * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, -v- 20-886-cr CHADRICK HALL, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x * Judge Victor A. Bolden, of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. FOR APPELLEE: NI QIAN, Assistant United States Attorney (Danielle R. Sassoon, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, New York. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: PATRICK J. JOYCE, Law Office of Patrick J. Joyce, New York, New York. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cote, J.). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED as moot. Defendant-Appellant Chadrick Hall appeals from a judgment entered March 3, 2020, following a jury trial, convicting him of distribution and possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(c), 846. On March 3, 2020, the district court sentenced Hall principally to 18 months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. On appeal, Hall challenges only the procedural reasonableness of his sentence, arguing that the district court erred by considering as relevant conduct his possession of 2.7 grams of crack cocaine and a firearm some weeks prior to his arrest for the offense of conviction. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. 2 During the course of this appeal, Hall completed his term of incarceration and was released from prison on November 10, 2020. He is currently serving a three- year …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals