United States v. Jose Fidel Magana

Case: 16-17341 Date Filed: 11/09/2017 Page: 1 of 5 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17341 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00162-ODE-AJB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE FIDEL MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (November 9, 2017) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-17341 Date Filed: 11/09/2017 Page: 2 of 5 Jose Magana pleaded guilty to unlawfully reentering the United States after deportation, and he now appeals the district court’s 38-month sentence as substantively unreasonable. Magana is a Mexican citizen who entered the country as a lawful permanent resident in 1987. In January 1991 he pleaded guilty in Georgia state court to enticing a child for indecent purposes, child molestation, and two counts of aggravated child molestation. He was sentenced to 15 years, with eight years in prison and the remainder on probation. He was paroled in October 1993. In 2000 an immigration judge ordered him removed based on the 1991 convictions and he was deported. He then reentered the country illegally in 2001, was arrested in 2016, and pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Magana’s guidelines range was 24–30 months in prison, which factored in the 1991 convictions for his total offense level (he received a ten-level enhancement from the base offense level because of the convictions) and his criminal history category of III (he received five points for the convictions). The district court decided to depart upward and sentence Magana to 38 months in prison because he served less than three years for the 1991 convictions. See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2 cmt. n.5 (Nov. 2016) (“There may be cases in which the offense level provided by an enhancement [based on a 2 Case: 16-17341 Date Filed: 11/09/2017 Page: 3 of 5 prior conviction] substantially understates or overstates the seriousness of the conduct underlying the prior offense, because . . . the time actually served was substantially less than the length of the sentence imposed for the prior offense. In such a case, a departure may be warranted.”). The district court overruled Magana’s objection that the 38-month sentence was substantively unreasonable. This is Magana’s appeal. We review the reasonableness of a sentence only for abuse of discretion. United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1188 (11th Cir. 2010) (en banc). The district court must consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), which include the “nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant,” deterrence, public safety, punishment, respect for the law, and the seriousness of the offense. Id. at 1189. “A district court abuses its discretion when it (1) fails to afford consideration to relevant factors that were due significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or (3) commits ...

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals